Menu

chadicenhour

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 34 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: 99 jeep cherokee first start problem #539013
    chadicenhourchadicenhour
    Participant

      The long crank time makes it sound like fuel pressure is leaking down. Also, the fuel smell after its running would make me believe theres too much fuel in the cylinders. Everything here points to the injectors leaking internally.

      in reply to: 99 jeep cherokee first start problem #543171
      chadicenhourchadicenhour
      Participant

        The long crank time makes it sound like fuel pressure is leaking down. Also, the fuel smell after its running would make me believe theres too much fuel in the cylinders. Everything here points to the injectors leaking internally.

        in reply to: Quad four wont start #502334
        chadicenhourchadicenhour
        Participant

          Swap the whole coil pack assembly or just the ignition module. I’ve been through this before with quad 4s as I’ve swapped many of them between my brothers GTZ and my friends GTZ. They were blowing engines every couple months. Theres a difference between the ignition modules. Anytime I swapped a chevy quad for a pontiac quad, I had to change the module. It could be a difference in the year, but I’ve always had to do it before it would fire up. Good luck.

          in reply to: Quad four wont start #504067
          chadicenhourchadicenhour
          Participant

            Swap the whole coil pack assembly or just the ignition module. I’ve been through this before with quad 4s as I’ve swapped many of them between my brothers GTZ and my friends GTZ. They were blowing engines every couple months. Theres a difference between the ignition modules. Anytime I swapped a chevy quad for a pontiac quad, I had to change the module. It could be a difference in the year, but I’ve always had to do it before it would fire up. Good luck.

            in reply to: Eric was mentioned by comedian Bill Burr #500243
            chadicenhourchadicenhour
            Participant

              [quote=”Davejp” post=49814]what a foul mouthed idiot he is.[/quote]

              To each their own. He happens to be one of my favorite comedians.

              in reply to: Eric was mentioned by comedian Bill Burr #501855
              chadicenhourchadicenhour
              Participant

                [quote=”Davejp” post=49814]what a foul mouthed idiot he is.[/quote]

                To each their own. He happens to be one of my favorite comedians.

                in reply to: 1999 pontiac montana engine not heating up #493822
                chadicenhourchadicenhour
                Participant

                  Theres a good chance that your lower intake manifold gaskets are leaking causing a loss of coolant. These engines are notorious for that. As far as not having heat, it sounds like you have air in the cooling system. The bleeder is located above the waterpump on a black pipe. It takes a 7mm wrench or socket to loosen. Make sure when you tighten it back down you don’t crank on it or it will break very easily. Just snug it up, it won’t leak.

                  in reply to: 1999 pontiac montana engine not heating up #495014
                  chadicenhourchadicenhour
                  Participant

                    Theres a good chance that your lower intake manifold gaskets are leaking causing a loss of coolant. These engines are notorious for that. As far as not having heat, it sounds like you have air in the cooling system. The bleeder is located above the waterpump on a black pipe. It takes a 7mm wrench or socket to loosen. Make sure when you tighten it back down you don’t crank on it or it will break very easily. Just snug it up, it won’t leak.

                    in reply to: 2000 impala (video) #493050
                    chadicenhourchadicenhour
                    Participant

                      Your intake gasket does look bad, but I’ve seen much worse. The slightest deformation would make a leak. Quite honestly, it isn’t much more work to pull the heads and replace the gaskets. The parts are cheap as well. If you decide to go that route, replace the head bolts as well…..they’re only like $25 for a set for this engine. Don’t forget, the push rods are different lengths, so you may want to keep them in order, but if memory serves me the exhaust valves take the longer push rods.

                      in reply to: 2000 impala (video) #494270
                      chadicenhourchadicenhour
                      Participant

                        Your intake gasket does look bad, but I’ve seen much worse. The slightest deformation would make a leak. Quite honestly, it isn’t much more work to pull the heads and replace the gaskets. The parts are cheap as well. If you decide to go that route, replace the head bolts as well…..they’re only like $25 for a set for this engine. Don’t forget, the push rods are different lengths, so you may want to keep them in order, but if memory serves me the exhaust valves take the longer push rods.

                        in reply to: 2005 Cavalier low compression #492114
                        chadicenhourchadicenhour
                        Participant

                          [quote=”SamG.” post=45680]Have you tried a wet test? You may have the cylinder wash. The ecotc isn’t interference but depending on how the car was driving when the chain broke it could of done some serious damage.[/quote]

                          I have a bucket of bent valves from a 04 Ecotec that would prove otherwise.

                          in reply to: 2005 Cavalier low compression #493297
                          chadicenhourchadicenhour
                          Participant

                            [quote=”SamG.” post=45680]Have you tried a wet test? You may have the cylinder wash. The ecotc isn’t interference but depending on how the car was driving when the chain broke it could of done some serious damage.[/quote]

                            I have a bucket of bent valves from a 04 Ecotec that would prove otherwise.

                            in reply to: 2005 Cavalier low compression #492095
                            chadicenhourchadicenhour
                            Participant

                              If you have an Ecotec 2.2, you have bent valves. A common problem with these engines are failing timing chain tensioners. Good luck.

                              in reply to: 2005 Cavalier low compression #493279
                              chadicenhourchadicenhour
                              Participant

                                If you have an Ecotec 2.2, you have bent valves. A common problem with these engines are failing timing chain tensioners. Good luck.

                                in reply to: Injector Issue! #488568
                                chadicenhourchadicenhour
                                Participant

                                  Unplug the injectors with it running, check for power on one of the wires and ground/pulse with a test light hooked to battery positive on the other wire. I’m not familiar with that car, but I assume the injector is signaled by the PCM through the ground wire. You may have a bad PCM.

                                Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 34 total)
                                Loading…
                                toto slot toto togel situs toto situs toto https://www.kimiafarmabali.com/
                                situs toto situs toto