@barneyb and thanking him for thinking about one or the other being bad rather than the whole thing.
Thanks, looking at my rear suspension again, honestly the struts from 7 years ago still have great return on them, so really I may have been downing Monroe struts when it’s just that the springs, shocks, have been older since 7 years ago and that’s what I really needed to replace back then…granted that was a long time ago, the struts may not have been “well” back then either, I don’t remember. But remember this, I’m certain that Monroe quality while good, is below OE standards. My dad, rest his soul, had a nearly new Toyota Corolla, and those struts performed much better. Remember also that for my car the higher end Monroe struts aren’t available, this is an analysis of their sensotrac from 7 years ago (my front struts are newly installed from product bought that long ago), which I believe they now call economatic.
The Moog is what I’m leaning toward most. I found their shocks alone for about $80 and since only $34 more dollars replaces everything, I think the ready strut is simply the best deal. I’ll hold on to the old struts just because they aren’t actually bad.
Something surprising. The Moog drops an inch for about every 800 lbs. I found some struts for sale that was a lowering kit downgrade (my words aren’t mistaken) that for every inch drop they hold an additional 125 pounds. Wow…they’re too low to get my tires flat on the road already and now with no weight at all it’ll be worse? Finding the pounds/in. on shocks has turned out to be very difficult, but since the Moog is amazing, my decision is made. (One of my concerns for a long time is that I like to load up the car a lot when traveling with my family, I needed heavier duty springs. Since I can’t find how much pounds per inch on the OE, I guess I’ll just find out after installation what’s up.)
If it’s months before I report back on the results, don’t be alarmed, I’m just waiting on the IRS to have the funds to proceed with my plan.