- This topic has 26 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 1 month ago by .
-
Topic
-
Hello!
So I’ve got 2005 corolla 1.6 (gasoline obviously) and noticed higher fuel consumption a few months ago. As i hooked up my OBD reader I noticed long term fuel trim was noticeably high, 15-16% at idle, but when accelerating it peaks as high as 21-24% and drops to 17-18% at cruising. So first thing I checked was vacuum leaks (even though it didn’t seem like a vacuum leak) and didn’t find any. Next thing i did was clean MAF which I had cleaned before maybe a year ago and so it wasn’t really dirty – did not help. At this point I suspected fuel delivery problem since fuel trims go up under load so I tried cleaning injectors. They weren’t clogged or especially dirty and spray pattern looked fine and so this didn’t really help much (noticed something like 1-2% decrease in LTFT) :angry: . After this I thought of measuring fuel pressure and since Toyota has special connectors in fuel lines and did not have tools to do the job myself, I took it to a service shop :unsure: . It came out as perfectly within specifications (50 psi) :huh: . At this point I was almost out of ideas, but came back to suspecting MAF sensor when I measured air flow volume at WOT. With Torque app I got about 72-73 grams/second of peak volume when WOT at 2nd gear. Now I have read that as thumb rule peak air flow volume should be around 80% of vehicle’s total horse power, and if this is true, as corolla has 110hp it would mean that 72g/s is only 65%~ of that. So does this mean my MAF sensor is reading too low figures, or is that only a result of a problem with my car :huh:? New MAF sensor costs around 150 euros here so I really don’t want to buy that until I’m fairly sure that is the problem. Oh yeah and spark plugs have been changed less than a year ago and inspected every one of them so I don’t believe them to be the problem. What would you suggest I do next? :sick:
And sorry for possible misspellings or grammar mistakes as English isn’t my native language (obviously :P), hope you understood most of it, thanks! 🙂
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.